Paul Kelly
London
The current economic situation is forcing executive teams to make tough decisions on spending and cost-cutting. This is particularly true when it comes to technology investment. The wider issues of knowing how to cut, how hard to cut and in a way that doesn’t cull capability (if that can be avoided) become even more pronounced where tech is concerned.
Cost-cutting on technology in this environment is very challenging. Tech budgets tend to grow annually as everything new is incremental to the cost base. And businesses need new technology as they look to remain competitive against new market entrants who can demonstrate greater agility as they don’t have legacy infrastructure issues to contend with.
Additionally, investors can become skittish during tough economic times and want guaranteed returns. So, cost optimisation on technology is in the spotlight – not least because technology spending will often be the single largest cost area for these organisations.
These organisations must establish a clear view of IT spending to identify opportunities for efficiency and cost-saving. Understanding the IT cost base and, consequentially, IT cost is only half the challenge.
Execution of cost reduction plans requires clear planning, business buy-in and a single-minded focus on the drive to get costs out. Many organisations struggle to get full executive buy-in and can find their plans diluted and results disappointing.
Getting clarity on your IT cost base
To make cost reduction decisions on the existing tech cost base, CEOs, CTOs, and CFOs need clarity around the breakdown of tech spending across all key services – including what is critical and what is discretionary across all IT capabilities. They also need a candid picture of the commercial implications of their decisions. Without this clarity and transparency, decisions can seem arbitrary and ultimately may prove detrimental to the business's fortunes.
This isn’t always easily achieved. Analysing the true technology costs across an organisation can be difficult due to reporting inconsistencies – even obscurity – around IT procurement spend, third-party digital service costs, the expense of shadow IT costs, and the division between operating and capital financing.
This needs to be addressed as the right level of analysis can reveal areas of potential overspending and levers for reduction. Based on our experience, this approach has resulted in cost reduction opportunities ranging from 5-20%.
Calculating your cost-to-serve
A key outcome of understanding the tech cost base is the ability to attribute costs to business products and services. This provides a technology ‘cost-to-serve’ for products and services, which may influence priorities and decisions based on the relative importance or income from these products/services. This greatly improves decision-making from a commercial perspective.
However, it’s not simple. Attributing tech costs in a structured, flexible and auditable way can only be carried out by having an end-to-end view of tech costs such that application, infrastructure, people, and third-party costs can be aligned to products and services, ensuring no overlap or gaps on an equitable basis.
This approach can uncover all IT costs that are often unreported across an organisation. Further analysis yields immediate cost reduction opportunities, whether removing duplicate or underutilised licensing, improving organisational structures or identifying and reducing discretionary spending and leakage.
A full cost-to-serve analysis can help:
Cost reduction execution
Execution of tech cost reduction change is not easy. It needs to be driven and supported from the top, be focused on measurable outcomes, and be wholly aligned to the business strategy. We have observed some consistent themes in these kinds of programmes:
Next up in our series:
Upcoming articles in our Technology Cost Optimisation series will cover: