Steve Hilgendorf
Chicago
Amid supply and demand volatility and worker shortages, the latest operational challenge facing manufacturing executives comes from the equipment they rely on to churn out their finished goods.
During the pandemic era, numerous companies neglected regular equipment maintenance schedules and postponed machinery investments. As a result, meeting increased production goals or reducing costs with sub-optimally running machinery has become challenging. The longer this underinvestment persists, the greater the risk of being trapped in a downward spiral of increasingly hindered production.
Asset reliability is crucial for efficient operations. It allows equipment to run at maximum speeds with minimal downtime, avoids costly emergency repairs, and maintains a steady production flow.
For those facing reduced product demand, improving asset reliability becomes crucial to meeting targets in the least amount of time to maintain efficiency, thereby avoiding overtime and minimizing operational shifts. For those trying to keep up with demand, neglecting maintenance only digs a deeper hole and can quickly snowball into a much more critical situation.
While there is no instant fix for restoring machines to peak performance, a structured focus on rebuilding a robust maintenance program, built on a consistent data-backed strategy and supported by predictive technology, can effectively address the problem and enhance the performance of the maintenance team.
In this two-part series, we’ll examine the wide-ranging causes and implications of the maintenance gap, focusing on how to ensure the basics are covered through traditional best practices. In part two, we’ll examine the future of maintenance and technology's role in driving productivity to new levels while keeping costs in check.
But first, how did we get here? The convergence of multiple issues, including supply chain shortages, shifts within the labor pool, and a lack of documented processes, are among the chief culprits.
Supply chain disruptions during the pandemic made obtaining spare parts and materials challenging. Delays in receiving crucial components led to postponed maintenance, increasing equipment failure risks. Financial pressures caused companies to cut maintenance budgets, reduce spending on parts, and lay off staff. Labor shortages worsened as seasoned professionals retired, leaving critical knowledge gaps and less experienced hires in need of mentorship and development. Lack of well-defined maintenance processes resulted in postponed routine and emergency maintenance, impacting equipment reliability. COVID-induced demand shifts affected equipment operation, leading to unplanned outages. Some companies even pushed equipment to “run till failure” to maximize production
Poor maintenance impacts extend beyond downtime
Poor maintenance practices impact the organization across five areas: equipment, customer, productivity and cost, people, and environment.
1. Equipment impact: Neglected equipment may require more time to diagnose and repair. Lack of off-the-shelf parts leads to increased costs. The lack of regular maintenance accelerates wear and tear, reducing the machinery’s lifespan. It can also lead to more frequent replacements, increasing capital expenditures.
2. Customer impact: Increased equipment downtime disrupts production schedules and results in missed shipments or the need to expedite them. This not only incurs direct costs to the business through service level agreements and penalties but can also lead to poor customer sentiment and potential loss of future business.
3. Productivity and cost impact: Equipment operating below optimal efficiency reduces overall output and productivity. Adding inconsistent or inadequate maintenance results in the machine not performing at its intended precision, resulting in lower quality output. Operating costs increase when repairs are delayed as minor problems escalate. Poorly maintained equipment often requires more power, resulting in increased energy costs.
4. People impact: While the impact on productivity and costs may appear evident, operating poorly maintained equipment places stress on workers and can lead to low morale. Employees supporting production lines with inadequate maintenance often work longer hours, including overtime and weekends, resulting in burnout and turnover. Additionally, this situation poses safety hazards, potentially leading to accidents and injuries, which could result in fines and legal repercussions for the company.
5. Environmental impact: Sub-optimally functioning equipment can produce higher levels of waste material, which may not meet environmental disposal standards. Additionally, leaks or failures in process equipment can lead to spills and environmental contamination, posing risks to local ecosystems and the potential for regulatory fines and cleanup costs.
Getting back to the basics is the first step in re-establishing effective maintenance
In a recent survey, nearly 70% of manufacturers said they are focused on “evolving their maintenance strategies to more proactive and preventative approaches.” While we agree that this is critical, the first step is ensuring you are effectively covering the basics.
First, put the strategic rationale and approach front and center, along with assessing staffing and training needs. A methodical approach to working through a checklist of key tasks will position production managers to improve record-keeping, analyze data to improve planning, and establish KPIs. Let’s consider some specific activities in the “back to basics” program.
1. Strategy development
2. Maintenance work management
3. Storeroom and critical spares management
4. Personnel management
5. Maintenance systems and KPIs
Working methodically through the “back to basics” plan can help stabilize an organization and reduce costly breakdowns and standardize maintenance activities. Once an organization has reached stable maintenance performance, continuous improvement efforts can shift to even more proactive activities enabled by the advances in smart factory technology. We will discuss more on how to structure preventative maintenance programs better and utilize smart factory technology in our next installment.